Abstract
Background: Asthma is a common chronic respiratory condition that affects from 1 to 18% of the world population. In Mexico, 8% of the population lives with asthma. Severe asthma represents up to 10% of cases. The proposal of an Asthma Center of Excellence has the main goal to develop key procedures, establishing methods and developing clinical experience based in modern technology and focused on critical procedures that allow institutions to build more efficient management procedures.
Objective: To bring to consensus the needs and opportunities identified in the public sector to create a center of excellence for severe asthma management.
Methodology: We used the RAND/UCLA method for consensus, through scientific evidence and the opinions of an asynchronous online modified Delphi panel of 14 experts from different institutions with experience in severe asthma management. Main recommendations: The panel provided considerations and recommendations to facilitate and standardize the diagnosis, management, treatment, and follow-up of patients with severe asthma, with particular emphasis on management of comorbidities, international considerations and strategies to evaluate treatment adherence and key resources for the development of a Center of Excellence.
Conclusion: The development of a Center of Excellence would allow to accelerate scientific innovation, education and advocacy, promoting excellence in education, research and training in the management of asthma.
Keywords: Asthma; Chronic respiratory condition; Severe asthma; Centers of excellence; Mexico; Public sector; Treatment adherence.
References
1. Elrod JK, Fortenberry JL Jr. Centers of excellence in healthcare institutions: what they are and how to assemble them. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17 (Suppl 1): 425. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2340-y
2. Maltby S, Gibson PG, Reddel HK, et al. Severe Asthma Toolkit: an online resource for multidisciplinary health professionals-needs assessment, development process and user analytics with survey feedback. BMJ Open. 2020; 10 (3): e032877. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032877
3. Organización Mundial de la Salud. www. who.int. [Online].; 2022 [cited 2022 07 05. Available from: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/asthma
4. Gaceta UNAM. www.gaceta.unam.mx. [Online]. 2024. https://www.gaceta.unam.mx/entre-el-5-y-12-de-la-poblacion-tiene-asma-en-mexico/
5. Global Initiative for Asthma. www.ginasthma.org. [Online]. 2022. https://ginasthma.org/.
6. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. Global Initiative for Asthma. www.ginasthma.org. [Online]. 2022. https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/GINA-Main-Report-2022-FINAL-22-07-01-WMS.pdf.
7. Gereda J, Arruda-Chaves E, Larco J, Matos E, et al. Asma grave: fisiopatología,diagnóstico y tratamiento. Rev Alergia Méx. 2024; 71 (2): 114-127.
8. Del-Río-Navarro BE, Berber A, Reyes-Noriega N, et al. Global Asthma Network Phase I study in Mexico: prevalence of asthma symptoms, risk factors and altitude associations-a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020; 7 (1): e000658. doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000658
9. Kaplan A, Szefler SJ, Halpin DMG. Impact of comorbid conditions on asthmatic adults and children. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2020; 30 (1): 36. doi:10.1038/s41533-020-00194-9
10. Martínez-Sahuquillo A, Ruiz De Vargas E. Métodos de consenso. Uso adecuado de la evidencia en la toma de decisiones. «Método RAND/UCLA». Rehabilitación. 2001; 35 (6): 388-392.
11. Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol. 2021; 11 (4): 116-129.
12. Sugerman DT. Centers of Excellence. JAMA. 2013; 310 (9): 994. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.277345.
13. Li J, Burson RC, Clapp JT, Fleisher LA. Centers of excellence: Are there standards?. Healthc (Amst). 2020; 8 (1): 100388. doi:10.1016/j.hjdsi.2019.100388

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Alergia México
